|
So, I’ll ask you again:
Are you a part of "the great majority of mankind" who "are satisfied with appearances as though they were realities… and are often more influenced by things that seem than by those that are"?
Are you "so simple that the deceiver will always find you ready to be deceived"?
If you are, in future, try not to be.
The first great edition of Machiavelli’s work was not published until 1782, 255 years after his death.
It arrived just in time for the French Revolution.
So, if most of the above is to be believed, what do we know now that we didn’t know before?
We can be certain that Masonic forces inspired, developed and brought about the French Revolution.
We can be certain that some of the "secret" rites and ceremonial practiced by the most senior initiates of the lodges were of Judaic/Kabbalistic origin, as they still are today.
We can be certain that not every Jewish freemason stood aside at this time and took no active part in an event that would have been of such great benefit to them.
However, we can’t be 100 per cent certain that the average Jew was over-represented an aggressive level, although we can certainly point to the central role of such as Adam Weishaupt, whose malign influence pervades the whole field.
Cagliostro, and Martinez de Pasquales, were also extremely influential movers and shakers in the construction and implementation of the coup.
It is also very possible that Rothschild finance and other Jewish mega-money may have greased a wheel or two.
Cicero tells us that the Roman consul Lucius Cassius Longinus Ravilla would instruct the magistrates of Rome to consider this question when a crime had been committed:
"Cui Bono"?
Which means "For Whose Good"?
Thus, who profitted from the crime?
If we apply the principal of "Cui Bono" to the French Revolution, one can say without a shadow of a doubt that the Jews were the principal beneficiaries of this event.
They were emancipated throughout most of Europe within a few years of the Revolution.
They have not looked back.
At the level of opinion and polite discourse, I suppose Ellman and Phillips might legitimately have taken Hamas to task for stating that the Jews brought about the French Revolution.
But when they megaphone their righteous indignation into the territory of the ignorant but interested, one or two are going to investigate these matters for themselves.
Which I am certain is the last thing Lou and Mel would have wanted.
Cui Bono?
Remember this phrase.
It works.
Churchill mentioned Rosa Luxemburg and Bela Kun in his Sunday Herald essay.
Let’s just have a little look at what the Spartacus History website has to say about these and their peers before we sign off.
"Rosa Luxemburg, the youngest of five children of a lower middle-class Jewish family was born in Zamosc, in the Polish area of Russia, on 5th March, 1871. She… emigrated to Zurich in 1889 where she studied law and political economy.
While in Switzerland she met other socialist revolutionaries from Russia living in exile including, Alexandra Kollontai, George Plekhanov, Leo Jogiches and Pavel Axelrod. In 1893 Luxeburg joined with Leo Jogiches to form the Social Democratic Party of Poland. As it was an illegal organization, she went to Paris to edit the party's newspaper, Sprawa Robotnicza (Workers' Cause).
Luxemburg married Gustav Lubeck in 1898 in order to gain German citizenship. She now settled in Berlin where she joined the Social Democratic Party. A committed revolutionary, Luxemburg campaigned with Karl Kautsky against the revisionist Eduard Bernstein, who argued that the best way to obtain socialism in an industrialized country was through trade union activity and parliamentary politics. In 1905 August Bebel appointed Luxemburg editor of SPD newspaper, Vorwarts (Forward).
During the 1905 revolution, Luxemburg and Jogiches returned to Warsaw where they were soon arrested.
Luxemburg's experiences during the failed revolution changed her views on international politics. Until then, Luxemburg believed that a socialist revolution was most likely to take place in an advanced industrialized country such as Germany or France. She now argued it could happen in an underdeveloped country like Russia...…
She continued to advocate the need for a violent overthrow of capitalism and she gradually became alienated from previous party colleagues, Karl Kautsky and August Bebel.
Luxemburg and Jogiches took the side of the Mensheviks in their struggle with the Bolsheviks. As a result Vladimir Lenin favoured the Polish section led by Karl Radek over those of Luxemburg.
In December, 1914, she joined with Karl Liebnecht, Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi, Ernest Meyer, Franz Mehring and Clara Zetkin to establish an underground political organization called Spartakusbund (Spartcus League)…
Luxemburg and Karl Liebnecht were arrested and imprisoned… Luxemburg was not released until October, 1918, when Max von Baden granted an amnesty to all political prisoners. Two months later Luxemburg joined with Karl Liebnecht, Leo Jogiches, Paul Levi, Ernest Meyer, Franz Mehring and Clara Zetkin to establish the German Communist Party. (KPD).
In January, 1919, Luxemburg helped organize the Spartakist Rising in Berlin. Friedrich Ebert, the leader of the Social Democrat Party and Germany's new chancellor, called in the German Army and the Freikorps to bring an end to the rebellion. By 13th January the rebellion had been crushed and most of its leaders were arrested.
Rosa Luxemburg and Karl Liebnecht were executed without trial on 15th January, 1919.
Leo Jogiches was later murdered while trying to track down her killers."
Hell of a lot of Jews involved in the communist rising in Berlin, Louise.
And, Melanie, it’s not me saying it, it’s the Spartcus History website, which is resourced in most British schoolrooms.
What, I wonder does this website have to say about a couple of gentlemen called Eisner and Levine?
Let’s see:
"On 7th November, 1918, Kurt Eisner, leader of the Independent Socialist Party, declared Bavaria a Socialist Republic…
Eisner's rule was short-lived as he was assassinated by Anton Graf Arco, a fanatical nationalist, on 21st February…
Fearing a counter-revolution, supporters of Eisner established Soldiers' and Workers' Councils and took over the government from the National Assembly. Eugen Levine, a member of the German Communist Party, became the new leader of the Bavarian Republic.
Levine, like the Bolsheviks had done in Russia, established Red Guard units to defend the revolution… the Red Guards began arresting people they considered to be hostile to the new regime. On 29th April, 1919, eight men were executed after being found guilty of being right-wing spies.
Friedrich Ebert, the president of Germany, now ordered the German Army and the Freikorps into Bavaria. They quickly gained control and over the next few weeks an estimate 700 men and women were captured and executed. Eugen Levine was arrested and, after being found guilty of being involved in the execution of the eight spies, was shot by a firing squad."
For "right-wing spies" you should read, "ordinary German blokes who were concerned enough to pay a bit too much attention to what Jewish communists like Eisner and Levine were doing in Germany.
This concern arising from an awareness what Jewish communists had been doing to the Russian people during the previous eighteen months.
In a similar vein, the August, 1919, US War Department report: The Power And Aims Of International Jewry, gives us the following massive clue as to why the German people welcomed the Nazis with open arms in the 1930s:
"Concerning the leaders of the Munich Soviet Revolution, Ben Hecht, himself a radical, in a cable published in the Chicago Daily News said:
"As for the Communist leaders in Bavaria, for instance Toller, Levine, Muhsam, Landauer, Lipp, and, in fact, all whom I met in the April Soviet days in Munich, were Jews…
One of the tragi-comic sides of the feverish German situation today is the position of the German Jews. Although less than one per cent of the German population consists of Jews, fully 75% of its present leaders, conservative and radical, are Semitic. The only political party which has no Jewish leaders is the centre or Catholic party, controlled by Mathias Erzberger. In Weimar, however, I have seen numerous centrist delegates to the national assembly whose Catholicism was political rather than racial.
As for the majority socialist, it must be remembered that the socialist party was founded by Karl Marx, a Jew, and co-ordinated by Ferdinand Lasalle and the elder Liebknecht, also Jews, while it was economically developed by Singer, another Jew. On the other hand the most active anti-socialist leaders in Germany, Theodor Wolff, George Bernhard and a dozen others of similar standing, are likewise Jews.
Hugo Haase, leader of the independent socialist party, is a Jew, as are practically all of its more important leaders, with the exception of Dr. Rudolph Breitscheld.
Nearly all of the newspaper editors and publicists whom I have encountered, from Maximilian Harden up and down the line, are Jews, and, so far as I can make out, nearly all the Berlin bankers are of the same race."
Ben Hecht, was a US-Jewish journalist, playwright and Hollywood script writer.
Hecht formed a committee to raise money for the Irgun, the chief terrorist organisation in Israel and, in his autobiography, he paid tribute to the notorious Jewish gangster Mickey Cohen who raised large sums of money for the Irgun through his criminal activities.
As for Bela Kun, well on page 517 of the 13th volume of The Encyclopedia Britannica, published in 1946 we are told that:
"The government of Bela Kun was composed almost entirely of Jews who held administrative offices."
Describing the situation in Hungary, on page 587 of the 1919 edition of the New International Year Book we read:
"One of the chief weaknesses in the new regime was antipathy to the Jews. |
|
