One MP gave the game away during the debate that day. He actually told Parliament and the British people the real reason why the war was about to be fought.

Hugh Bayley, New Labour MP for the City of York, who has suggested in parliament that he is Jewish, said this:

"Members of this House cannot ignore the fact that security for the state of Israel will be impossible as long as Saddam in Iraq is providing funding and support to the families of suicide bombers."

This is just about the closest any public figure has ever come to telling us the real reason why Tony Blair took us to war with Iraq.

More than 100,000 people have died in this second Gulf War because Israel and the Neoconservaties of Washington and New York, most of whom are themselves Jewish, wished to punish an Iraqi regime that funded the rebuilding of Palestinian homes bulldozed by the Israeli Defence Force, as a consequence of a family member having carried out a suicide bombing.

Oil would be a glorious bonus, but it was never the casus belli.

The Jewish political and media establishment wanted Israel’s enemy destroyed.

George Bush senior called off the dogs too early during Gulf War I and the job was left unfinished.

The Jewish Neoconservatives, Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis Libby and Richard Perle began their long march back to war almost as soon as this first Gulf War ended.

The clamour for Iraq’s destruction grew in intensity when the  media baron, Rupert Murdoch, who is also Jewish, set up the Washington rag The Weekly News in 1995 and gave the Neoconservatives a regular platform for their hawkish opinions.

When 9/11 came along, coincident with the most intellectually challenged President in US history, they had all the excuse they needed. It didn’t hurt to have a greasy, New World Order careerist in place in Downing Street, eager to please and ready to sit up and beg on command.

On the 18^th of March, 2003, the day of the great debate, I sent a couple of e-mails to Glenda Jackson and George Galloway, two of the most anti-war MPs, which contained information that I thought might undermine the shiny-eyed zealot and those that were spoiling for a fight.

I also tried to pass this stuff on to Tam Dalyell, the Father of the House, to my mind the most honourable man in parliament but, unfortunately, he had no e-mail facility.

I got a surprise that night. The phone rang.

It was Tam Dalyell.

As a consequence of our little chat, I promised to post a written copy of the information that I had at my disposal to his home address. I asked Mr. Dalyell a simple question before I hung up and he gave me a simple answer.

My question was:

"How many Kurds, do you believe were killed at Halabja"?

He replied:

"About 400".

Whenever Halabja has been mentioned by the British and American warmongers, they have always categorically pronounced that the number of people killed was 5,000.

I knew this to be a lie and Mr. Dalyell confirmed it for me during our brief conversation.

I sent him a much larger document than the one I had sent to Glenda Jackson and George Galloway.

In total, I provided Mr. Dalyell with 80 foolscap pages of damning information. This was forwarded to him about ten days after he phoned me.

However, I never heard from him again and the information that I sent to Galloway and Jackson was not used in that final debate on Iraq. I e-mailed the same information to a good many journalists, specifically, to those whose newspapers seemed to be making an effort to bring the war in Iraq to an end.

None ever replied.

Interestingly, however, a few months later, Tam Dalyell suggested that several members of Chairman Blair’s entourage were a part of a "Jewish Cabal", intent on stoking up the fires of war.

He first made these opinions known in the US magazine, Vanity Fair.

He echoed his accusations on Radio 4's World at One programme, saying that the government of the US was:

"… being unduly influenced by a cabal of Jewish advisers… There is far too much Jewish influence in the United States."

He went on to describe some of the "neoconservatives" who comprise the enormously influential advisory body, JINSA:

"The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs - I was thinking of Wolfowitz, Deputy Defence Minister Perle, Bolton, Assistant Secretary of State, Feith, Adelman, Abrams and Fleischer. Those people drive this policy… I am worried about my country being led up the garden path on a Likudnik (Ariel) Sharon agenda... Straw, Mandelson & Co. are leading a tremendous drive to sort out the Middle East".

Mr. Dalyell also said that he had:

"… picked out one person about whom I am extremely concerned, and I have to be blunt about it. That is Lord Levy… I believe his influence has been very important on the Prime Minister and has led to what I see as this awful war and the sack of Baghdad".

Actually, though the fathers of both Mandelson and Straw were Jewish, their mothers were not, and so, technically speaking, they are not Jewish.

However, the way they act and the company they keep adequately demonstrates where their sympathies truly lie.

So, I guess it is possible that Tam Dalyell didn’t just chuck my 80-page "dossier" into the bin when he discovered its "anti-Semitic" thrust.

Perhaps it made him think and do a bit of research. I just wish I knew why he didn’t call me back. One day I’ll pluck up the courage to give him a call and find out why.

Suffice it say that no MP and no British newspaper have ever mentioned the things that I passed on to the aforementioned MPs in March, 2003.

In all, as of February, 2006, almost 2500 coalition troops had lost their lives in Iraq andmore than 20,000 had been injured.

The British medical journal The Lancet believes that in excess of 100,000 Iraqis have lost their lives. The various coalition forces do not keep proper records of the Iraqi dead.

What follows is an edition of the HALABJA document that I emailed to George Galloway and Glenda Jackson on the 18^th of March, 2003.

Well, in March, 1988, Halabja was a hotly contested war zone and the fact of the matter is that gas was used against the opposing forces BY BOTH SIDES in the Iranian/Iraqi conflict.

A week after the gassing of the Kurds at Halabja in March, 1988, Charles Redman, a US State Department spokesman said:

"There are indications that Iran may also have used chemical artillery shells in this fighting. We call on Iran and Iraq to desist immediately from the use of any chemical weapons."

A US Defence Intelligence Agency Report released in March, 1988, put it this way:

"Most of the casualties in Halabja were reportedly caused by cyanogen chloride. This agent has never been used by Iraq, but Iran has shown interest in it. Mustard gas casualties in the town were probably caused by Iraqi weapons, because Iran has never been noted using that agent."

The 17^th of April, 1988 edition of The New York Times reported thus:

"Iran expects to reap a propaganda harvest by showing that Iraq is gassing those of its own citizens deemed sympathisers in the seven-year-old war... According to the Iranians, a single Iraqi chemical attack on the Iranian-occupied village of Halabja last month killed 5,000 people and injured 5,000 others."

Then, in 1990, US Army War College experts, Professor Stephen Pelletiere, Colonel Douglas Johnson and Leif Rosenberger produced the report: Iraqi power and US security in the Middle East, which stated:

"In March 1988, the Kurds at Halabjah were bombarded with chemical weapons, producing a great many deaths. Photographs of the Kurdish victims were widely disseminated in the international media. Iraq was blamed for the Halabjah attack, even though it was subsequently brought out that Iran too had used chemicals in this operation, and it seemed likely that it was the Iranian bombardment that had actually killed the Kurds…

Blood agents were allegedly responsible for the most infamous use of chemicals in the war, the killing of Kurds at Halabjah.